Linux Mint 16 network-manager-gnome breaks wifi?
Posted: 2013-12-19 22:51:08 by Alasdair Keyes
I'm on call at the moment, which is never fun, but to make it worse, whilst I was logged into servers at work trying to fix an issue, my wifi died.
It wasn't just my router losing connection, the network manager in Mint 16 just didn't want to know about wifi. All options to use it were greyed out and the following errors were in syslog (Please forgive the wall of text)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka wpa_supplicant[987]: rfkill: WLAN hard blocked
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.552595] wlan0: deauthenticating from [wifi router mac] by local choice (reason=3)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.553638] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcmsmac: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: disassociated
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.553646] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: arp filtering: 1 addresses (implement)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.553649] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos enabled: false (implement)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka wpa_supplicant[987]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=[wifi router mac] reason=3
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka NetworkManager[944]: [info] WiFi now disabled by radio killswitch
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka NetworkManager[944]: [info] (wlan0): device state change: activated -> unavailable (reason 'none') [100 20 0]
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka NetworkManager[944]: [info] (wlan0): deactivating device (reason 'none') [0]
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.612636] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Interface wlan0.IPv6 no longer relevant for mDNS.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv6 with address [wifi adapter ipv6 address].
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Interface wlan0.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv4 with address [wifi adapter ipv4 address].
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Withdrawing address record for [wifi adapter ipv6 address] on wlan0.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Withdrawing address record for [wifi adapter ipv4 address] on wlan0.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv4 with address [wifi adapter ipv4 address].
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: New relevant interface wlan0.IPv4 for mDNS.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Registering new address record for [wifi adapter ipv4 address] on wlan0.IPv4.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka wpa_supplicant[987]: rfkill: WLAN hard blocked
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641875] cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641879] cfg80211: (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641881] cfg80211: (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641882] cfg80211: (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641883] cfg80211: (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 20000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641885] cfg80211: (5170000 KHz - 5250000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.641886] cfg80211: (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.776410] usb 1-1.3: USB disconnect, device number 5
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.776419] usb 1-1.3.1: USB disconnect, device number 7
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka NetworkManager[944]: [info] (wlan0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP client pid 1584
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka kernel: [ 2855.786157] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Withdrawing address record for [wifi adapter ipv4 address] on wlan0.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv4 with address [wifi adapter ipv4 address].
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka avahi-daemon[665]: Interface wlan0.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS.
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka NetworkManager[944]: [warn] DNS: plugin dnsmasq update failed
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka NetworkManager[944]: [info] Removing DNS information from /sbin/resolvconf
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka dnsmasq[2210]: setting upstream servers from DBus
Dec 19 21:56:05 luka dbus[584]: [system] Activating service name='org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' (using servicehelper)
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka kernel: [ 2855.862901] usb 1-1.3.2: USB disconnect, device number 8
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka kernel: [ 2855.864109] usb 1-1.3.3: USB disconnect, device number 9
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka bluetoothd[624]: Adapter /org/bluez/624/hci0 has been disabled
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka bluetoothd[624]: Unregister path: /org/bluez/624/hci0
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka bluetoothd[624]: Endpoint unregistered: sender=:1.55 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSink
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka bluetoothd[624]: Endpoint unregistered: sender=:1.55 path=/MediaEndpoint/A2DPSource
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka bluetoothd[624]: Endpoint unregistered: sender=:1.55 path=/MediaEndpoint/HFPAG
Dec 19 21:56:06 luka bluetoothd[624]: Endpoint unregistered: sender=:1.55 path=/MediaEndpoint/HFPHS
What's interesting is rfkill detecting that my WiFi was hard blocked (disabled by a hardware switch), but my laptop doesn't have a hardware switch for disabling wireless and a reboot didn't help at all.
I had run a system update a few hours before and saw from /var/log/apt-history.log that apt had updated the network-manager-gnome package, that could well have been the cause so I rolled back....
I was currently running version 0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5.1
# dpkg -l | grep network-manager-gnome
ii network-manager-gnome 0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5.1 amd64 network management framework (GNOME frontend)
I checked what versions were available to me..
# apt-cache showpkg network-manager-gnome | grep -A 10 "Provides"
Provides:
0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5.1 -
0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5 -
Reverse Provides:
And then downgraded, it seems that libnm-gtk0 is a dependency so it had to be downgraded as well...
# apt-get install network-manager-gnome=0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5 libnm-gtk0=0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
...
...
Setting up network-manager-gnome (0.9.8.0-1ubuntu5) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
I rebooted my machine and I had wireless back again, I'm not sure if the update caused the issue as wifi was working fine for a couple of hours after the update, but rolling back seemed to fix it. I don fancy trying an upgrade to the same package again to test it. I'll leave those updates to see if another one is shortly release. Worth a try if you get the same issue...
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
CentOS/Redhat PHP updates break sessions with suPHP
Posted: 2013-12-12 12:50:14 by Alasdair Keyes
With the recent PHP update for Redhat/CentOS in the past few days, it's brought to light a problem I've seen before and always forget about.
When the PHP RPM is installed it updates the permissions on the PHP session directory back to the defaults...
# stat /var/lib/php/session | grep Uid
Access: (0770/drwxrwx---) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 48/ apache)
Like many I run suPHP, so all my sites use different users to execute. This will break sessions for all sites on my server as only root/apache can write to that folder.
As a fix, I've updated the PHP session path to be a custom location and set permissions as 1777.
mkdir /var/lib/php/mynewsessionfolder
chmod 1777 /var/lib/php/mynewsessionfolder
Then create a file called /etc/php.d/customsession.ini with the text
session.save_path = /var/lib/php/mynewsessionfolder
The permissions 1777 means that the folder is world read/writeable but when a user creates a file it is created as 600 permissions so only they can read/write to it
# ls -l /var/lib/php/mynewsessionfolder
total 4
-rw------- 1 auser auser 377 Dec 12 12:45 sess_6pjpshqnr06egukas50s0mhjk6
Next time PHP updates it will reset permissions on the standard session folder, but won't affect you
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Noisili - Relaxing Noises
Posted: 2013-12-12 10:49:16 by Alasdair Keyes
I was forwarded this link today, it's a website that provides background and ambient noise such as rain, forest sounds, evem running water (although I'm not sure that will have a relaxing effect)
My office is often quite noisy being in the same room as people on the phone all the time and sometimes listening to music is too distracting, this could be my new favourite site at work.
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Cryptography Introduction
Posted: 2013-12-11 12:10:54 by Alasdair Keyes
Cryptography is one of the most important branches of maths in the modern age.
Almost everything that requires security/secrecy in our life relies on it. However the basics of it aren't well understood by many, even those who work with it daily, such as System Administrators.
Cryptography can get very complex and way beyond anyone who hasn't got a doctorate, however a basic grounding in some principles behind it is very useful (and interesting, if you're that way inclined)
I came across these videos whilst browsing Reddit which I would recommend to anyone that wants to learn more.
Public key (Or Asymmetric) Cryptography: Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange
Gambling with secrets (Cryptography)
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Elementary OS
Posted: 2013-08-22 12:56:53 by Alasdair Keyes
For the past 6 months or so I've been running Linux Mint 15 as my Desktop OS. It can be a little slow in it's operation, slight lag in response to mouseclicks etc. so I've been on the lookout for a new desktop distro when someone point out Elementary OS.
It's fairly new and based on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. It's highly customized to look like OS X, while I'm not a huge fan of the OS X interface it does have some nice features.
I installed it on a VM for a quick play and the first thing I noticed was how fast it was. Everything seemed to open instantly.
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
PHP Session Garbage Collecting - Not great for shared hosting (Repost)
Posted: 2013-04-02 12:28:47 by Alasdair Keyes
This is a repost of an old article that I transferred across from my previous blog. I've only just noticed that it was incomplete so I've completed it and reposted it
I look after a fair sized Linux shared hosting cluster (20,000+ websites) and to provide PHP session persistence between the servers in the cluster, PHP sessions are stored on an NFS share.
I noticed that a number of processes where running for a long time on the Apache servers. At first I thought this was due to loops or bad coding on behalf of the website owners, but it didn't seem to be restricted to any particular users.
After running strace on one of these processes I saw that the processes where getting permission denied trying to delete large numbers of PHP session files.
It turns out that PHP implements it's own internal garbage collection to get rid of old sessions, however, as we run SuPHP, the PHP processes only have permissions to delete their own session files (due to the use of Linux's sticky bit permissions), but that doesn't stop the process recursing through the sessions folder and trying to delete all old sessions.
With 20,000 websites, most of which run PHP CMS systems, this is quite a drain, compounded by the fact it's on an NFS share, which also adds overhead to each filesystem request.
The solution was to turn off garbage collection in PHP config. Create a config fragment file /etc/php.d/disable_session_gc.ini on the webhead and add the following content
; Disable auto session garbage collector
session.gc_probability = 0
Obviously I didn't want the sessions building up on our NFS filer, so I just set up a cronjob to call tmpwatch and delete old files once per day. I decided 7 days would be adequate.
/etc/cron.daily/clear_php_sessions.sh
/usr/sbin/tmpwatch 168 /exports/php/sessions
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Sprechen sie Deutsch?
Posted: 2013-02-06 23:13:46 by Alasdair Keyes
Nein :(
But I'm learning, in a break from my computer related antics, I've started learning German. I've always found myself fairly comfortable with maths and logic, but languages have always been beyond my grasp. My French has always been shady, I usually end up telling someone that their Grandmother uses a Rubik's cube in a manner other than intended. There's just no logic to languages.... I mean, how are you supposed to remember the difference between masculine and feminine nouns and which conjugation of verb to use, quite frankly, I have no idea what that is in English.
But then I heard about http://duolingo.com, it's a website that teaches you various languages from the beginning. It teaches very brief sentences and then asks you to translate, both to and from English and also allows you to speak it and grades your performance. New words are slowly introduced and I apparently know 29 words in German.... dies ist gut, ja?
Obviously you may wish to learn another language, but even after just a few days, spending 30 minutes in the evening I can start to speak some simple German sentences, I can't recommend it highly enough.
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Stability vs. Security vs. Functionality
Posted: 2013-01-15 20:49:36 by Alasdair Keyes
In the world of GNU/Linux there are a number of well known Enterprise distributions and distributions that have gained a reputation for stability and reliability. Primarily, Red Hat Enterprise Linux boasts itself as the number one enterprise distribution and Debian also has a reputation among sys-admins for being rocksteady.
These distributions are reliable and stable, however that comes at a cost. Recent releases of software often have bugs and/or security flaws in them, which puts people off upgrading to them until the bugs have been worked out. It's this mantra that Debian and Redhat adopt to gain their reputation for reliability. Sadly, the recently released software also has all the latest security patches and new features.
This creates a trade off between running the latest software which is patched for all known bugs and has more functionality and running older software which is more reliable, but comes with less features and doesn't have the latest patches.
Of course, Redhat and other vendors do backport security patches when flaws are found, and Redhat have their Fedora project which is at the bleeding edge of software releases, but I think the days of large distributions running far out-dated software are coming to an end. Back porting patches in this manner is effective, but usually only done once a compromise has actually been exploited, rather than when the upstream software has fixed the bug, and the time difference between the two can be great. Debian has within the past few years started catching up with the latest upstream software and I think this is the right track.
Some of you may have already worked out that the recent Exim remote root exploit has triggered this post. More information can be found at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/11/exim_code_execution_peril/ and https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0970.html.
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Firewalls... there for a reason
Posted: 2013-01-15 20:49:36 by Alasdair Keyes
Everyone knows the necessity of firewalls on a modern computer systems, protecting all the way from the heavy iron down to your home PC, however I've noticed a strange trend in companies to just not bother with software firewalls at all.
I know most companies have many firewall appliances which restrict access to various parts of their network and combined with correct routing can lock down a network very tightly, however I always think it's paramount to run software firewalls on all your boxes.
No one designs their network to get attacked, however any network that has been in production for several years will have been changed, re-patched, ammended, VLANs updated, routes added, that temporary firewall rule exception you added to grant an entire subnet access on all ports just because you couldn't see why you were getting connection errors. It's only natural that in that time mistakes will get made, possibly giving a small opening to someone you don't want in your network, and with the plethora of complex network penetration/hacking scripts about, it only takes one script to go un-noticed for a couple of months, probing and prodding at your network and it could have found a way through your to some very sensitive parts of your infrastructure.
Software firewalls certainly shouldn't be your only protection, however I would consider them the first and last line of defense. For shared hosting web servers they are the first line of defense against a nasty binary that has been uploaded through an insecure PHP script. For internal and backend systems such as database servers they are the last line of defense when someone has managed to get through the rest of your network security and is one step away from brute forcing your MySQL logins.
One excuse that is given is that it adds undue load to a server, yes, to a degree this is correct, however if you've got a server that has so many hundreds of thousands of connections that a software firewall is bogging it down, you should really look at some kind of load-balancing so that you can spread that load over more hardware.
Having spent most of my career working in Shared Hosting environments, we actively open up our networks to potential compromise. Anyone can buy shared hosting for very little money and run pretty much any PHP/Ruby/Perl/Python script they wish, and with the advent of more and more Wordpress and Joomla exploits, it doesn't take long before you'll find some shady scripts attempting to be executed.
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
Desktop VMs with Virtualbox
Posted: 2013-01-15 20:49:36 by Alasdair Keyes
I've recently been doing some development of a cluster of machines, obviously virtualization is the way to go.
To this end I've been using Virtualbox a great deal. I'm not really a great fan of Oracle, either with their flagship DB,or with some of the decisions they've made surrounding MySQL since they acquired it from Sun. However along with their acquisition of Sun they got Virtualbox, and in my eyes it can do no wrong.
It's a very simple, lightweight hypervisor with good support for a range of guest OS's. I've not yet found one that won't install SuSE, CentOS, Redhat, CentOS 4/5/6, Ubuntu, Debian, Open Solaris, (I've not tried silly examples like Windows 95).
If you found this useful, please feel free to donate via bitcoin to 1NT2ErDzLDBPB8CDLk6j1qUdT6FmxkMmNz
© Alasdair Keyes
IT Consultancy Services
I'm now available for IT consultancy and software development services - Cloudee LTD.
Happy user of Digital Ocean (Affiliate link)
Version:master-bf499308a7
